Overview

The standard housing model relies on individual ownership of rarely used assets (lawnmowers, guest rooms, large private kitchens), resulting in high embodied carbon and waste. Furthermore, fragmented living arrangements contribute to a loneliness epidemic, weakening community resilience during climate shocks.

This policy shifts the focus from “energy-efficient independent units” to “resource-efficient communities.” It establishes a municipal framework to incentivize Cohousing and Housing Cooperatives (Co-ops) through radical resource sharing, enforceable zoning standards, and equity safeguards.

Policy 1: The “Share-Shed” Zoning Overlay

Concept: Current zoning often penalizes shared living by mandating excessive private amenities. This overlay creates a “Density for Sharing” swap: developers get higher density allowances if they reduce private footprints in favor of verifiable shared assets.

The Policy: Municipalities shall adopt a Cohousing Overlay Zone applicable to residential areas. To qualify, developments must meet the “Share-Shed” Standard:

1. Common House Mandate: Minimum 15% of gross floor area dedicated to communal use (commercial-grade kitchen, dining, co-working, meeting rooms). Shared areas shall be protected through recorded covenants prohibiting privatization or subdivision.
2. Guest Room Banking: Private units may be smaller than standard minimums if guest rooms are pooled into shared, bookable suites governed by house rules and a booking ledger retained for inspections.
3. Library of Things: Mandatory shared infrastructure for high-carbon tools (laundry, woodworking, gardening) with an inventory register; removal requires municipal approval.

Enforcement:

• Compliance verified at site plan approval and certificate of occupancy.
• Annual self-certification submitted to the municipality confirming shared spaces remain accessible and unconverted; subject to inspection.
• Violations trigger restoration orders and fines indexed to floor area.

Why It Works:

• Decarbonization: Reduces embodied carbon by eliminating redundant appliances and square footage.
• Resilience: The “Common House” serves as a built-in emergency hub during power outages or heat waves.

Real-World Example:

• Vienna, Austria: The city uses a “Social Sustainability” scoring matrix for new developments. Developers must propose how residents will interact and share resources to win land bids. This effectively mandates the community-building aspect of cohousing into all social housing.¹

Policy 2: The “Public Land for Public Good” Pipeline

Concept: The biggest barrier to Co-ops and Cohousing is the high cost of land. Speculative developers will always outbid community groups. This policy removes land from the speculative market.

The Policy:

1. Surplus Land Priority: City-owned surplus land is offered first to Community Land Trusts (CLTs) or registered Co-op Groups on long-term nominal leases (up to 99 years) with resale and anti-speculation clauses.
2. Social Value Tender: Public land is awarded based on social, environmental, and affordability outcomes (not price alone), evaluated with a published scoring rubric.

Why It Works:

• Affordability: Removing the land cost allows Co-ops to offer rents 30-50% below market rates.
• Control: Ensuring land stays in community hands prevents future displacement/gentrification.

Real-World Examples:

• Vancouver, Canada: The City purchased the 1700 Kingsway parcel for social housing and leased it to the Community Land Trust Foundation of BC, allowing The Brice to deliver 48 permanently affordable homes while the land remains in public hands.²
• Amsterdam, Netherlands: The “Zelfbouw” (Self-Build) policy sets aside specific plots exclusively for citizen-led co-ops. This enabled projects like De Warren, a carbon-positive co-op built by its residents with a massive shared “energy facade.”³

Policy 3: Zoning for “Invisible Density” & Functional Families

Concept: Many zoning codes define a “household” as related family members, effectively making co-living by unrelated adults illegal. This prevents “forming groups” from retrofitting large existing homes into cohousing.

The Policy:

1. Functional Family Definition: Amend “household” to allow unrelated individuals living as a single housekeeping unit that shares common space, expenses, and long-term intent; short-term rentals are excluded. Provide a model ordinance definition with objective factors (shared lease or ownership, shared meals/chores, joint utilities) to withstand legal challenge.
2. Cluster Housing: Allow cottage courts and clustered units on single lots without subdivision, provided shared access, open space, and maintenance agreements are recorded.

Safeguards and Enforcement:

• Fire and occupancy codes fully apply.
• Management plans must address noise, waste, parking, and conflict resolution; approval required at permit issuance and reviewed at renewal.
• Revocation triggers (e.g., illegal short-term rental conversion) shall be defined with notice and cure periods.

Why It Works:

• Immediate Action: Unlocks existing housing stock for co-living without new construction.
• Missing Middle: Allows gentle density in established neighborhoods.

Real-World Example:

• Kingston, Ontario: The city is exploring zoning reforms to allow “missing middle” density and recognize “forming groups.” Advocates are using the city’s climate emergency declaration to argue that sharing distinct, smaller units on a single lot (Cluster Housing) is a key climate strategy.⁴

Equity and Anti-Displacement Measures

Projects using public land, subsidies, or zoning bonuses must:

• Prioritize households with rent burden or displacement risk; set income targets (e.g., majority below area median income tiers set by policy).
• Cap member buy-in contributions and prohibit market-rate resale; use shared-equity formulas with right-of-first-refusal for the CLT/municipality.
• Require right-to-return where redevelopment displaces existing residents.

Governance and Stability Requirements

All cohousing and cooperative projects must adopt formal governance to ensure long-term viability:

• Written bylaws and decision-making rules (consensus/sociocracy or supermajority) with quorum thresholds.
• Clear membership criteria, onboarding, and exit procedures with payout formulas.
• Conflict resolution process with escalation and access to mediation.
• Annual budgets, reserve policies, and financial reporting available to members; independent review or audit for projects receiving public support.
• Roles for facilities maintenance, shared space scheduling, and compliance reporting.

Implementation Roadmap

Phase	Action Item
Immediate	Audit surplus land suitable for CLT or co-op pilots; publish scoring rubric for social-value tendering.
Year 1	Adopt Functional Family zoning reforms, Share-Shed overlay, and parking reductions tied to shared mobility plans.
Year 2	Establish revolving predevelopment loan fund and technical assistance program (legal, governance, facilitation).
Year 3	Formalize social-value-based public land disposition; require annual compliance reports on shared spaces and equity metrics.

Appendix A: Cohousing Governance Checklist

Discussion on GitHub

Join the GitHub discussion to share your ideas.